↑ Return to H20 Comp Devices

H21 Computer

by
George Morgan
My articles
Follow on:

Page no: H21

Overall Comparison incl. Mac

Price and Overall Comparison

Versus 

(Web Archive)

 

Name CPU Model Price overall Cores Threads
Mac
Mini 2020
M1 500€ 60 8 8
Mac
Mini 2019
i7-8700B 285€ 56 6 12
Mac
Mini 2018
i3-8300 130€ 54 4 4
George-BG FX-6300 30€ 49 3 (windows) 6
Elite i7
3.4 GHz
i7-4770 120€ 44 4 8
Elite i5 3.3Ghz i5-2500 30€ 34 4 4
IMac 2011 i5-2500S 36€ 34 4 4

 

 

 

 

Mac Mini CPU Performance vs. Elite

Source GeekBench

 

Name Mine Processor Single Core Multi Core Cores Threads
Mac Mini Late 2020, M1 1707 7389 8 8
Mac Mini Late 2018, i7-8700 1099 5467 6 12
Mac Mini Late 2018 i5-8500B 999 4663 4 4
Elite 800 G1 SFF
3.4 GHz
X i7-4770 3.4 GHz 978 3371 4 8
Mac Mini  late 2018 i3-8300 895 3186 4 4
Elite 8200 I5
3.3GHz
X i5-2500
3.3GHz
705 2625
IMac Mid 2011 X i5-2500S 727 2680 4 4
George-BG X AMD FX-6300 516 1891 6 6
Lenovo T420S Lap X i7-2620M 576 1248 2 4
Media PC X Core2Duo E8200 390 1010 4 4

Windows Comps

See here

Versus Comparison

 

amd-fx-6300-vs-intel-core-i7-2600-vs-intel-core-i7-3770-vs-intel-core-i7-4770-vs-intel-core-i7-6700t

.

 

Computer Upgrade

  • make videos
  • run Skype with Share screen
  • and/or teamviewer
  • able to do screenshots: e,g. Greenshot
    and export it into Paint Net
  • Runs only when working.

Performance

Required CPU, at least:

Elite 800 G1 SFF

Intel Core i7-4770 or AMD FX-8350

 

 

 

Elite 8200.

  • Intel Core i7-2600 (3.40 GHz, 8MB cache, 4 cores)
  • Intel Core i5-2500 (3.30 GHz, 6MB cache, 4 cores)
  • Intel Core i5-2400 (3.10 GHz, 6MB cache, 4 cores)  –> Elite i5
  • Intel Core i3-2120 (3.30 GHz, 3MB cache, 2 cores)
  • Intel Core i3-2100 (3.10 GHz, 3MB cache, 2 cores)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FX 8350 versus Intel i7-4770

.

HP Elite 8300 SFF

SATA0-3: Right to Left

 

   

HP Elite 8200 SFF

HP Elite 8200 SFF

Model: CZC401232V

 

Expansion Slots:

1 low-profile PCI
1 low-profile PCIe x1
2 low-profile PCIe x16

 

George-BG Biostar A960D+ with AMD FX

(source)

RAM: 2 slots

  • Bus Clock
    1333 MHz, 1066 MHz, 800 MHz, 1866 MHz (O.C.), 1600 MHz (O.C.)
  • Technology
    DDR3
  • Max Size
    16 GB
Expansion Slots
1 x CPU
2 x DIMM 240-pin
1 x PCIe 2.0 x16
1 x PCIe 2.0 x1
1 x PCI

AUDIO/Video

  • Audio Codec
    Realtek ALC662
  • Compliant Standards
    High Definition Audio
  • Video Output
    graphics adapter
  • Graphics Processor
    ATI Radeon HD 3000

 

Processor

AMD FX-6300: Six-Core: George-BG

AMD FX-6300 advantages

against Dell 430 XPS (george-Zurich and George-BG)

  • In single-threaded programs, the AMD FX-6300 is 4% faster. The performance advantage is application specific. In some of them this CPU could be up to 16% faster.
  • Multi-threaded performance of the processor is better.
  • The AMD FX-6300 supports hardware acceleration of virtualized tasks.
  • The CPU includes SSE4.2 instructions.
  • The microprocessor incorporates AES technology, that accelerates AES encryption. The technology is beneficial if you need to secure your disk or network data.
Instruction Set
  • The FX-6300 supports AVX, F16C, FMA3 and XOP instructions, introduced in the recent past. These extensions are not broadly supported by applications yet, but their support should improve in future programs.
  • The CPU has FMA4 instruction set extension enabled. The FMA4 technology is only offered on AMD CPUs, thus it may not get broad support from software vendors.
  • The AMD FX-6300 is unlocked. Therefore, the microprocessor can be freely overclocked on most motherboards when greater performance is needed. Be aware that overclocking voids warranty of the processor.

Media-PC George-FB-Now and George-BG

Dell 430 XPS: Intel Core2 Quad 8200

/ 420 XPS: Intel Core2 Quad 6600

Technical Data
CM12 Technical Data

- Click to enlarge

 

AMD FX-6300 vs Intel Core i7-3770

(source)

Performance i7-3770 clearly better, better 32% to 67%

Graphics can be enhanced when using external graphics card.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FX6300 vs i7-3770 Performance

.

 

 

Power Consumption

AMD FX8350 (George-BG) has some issues with power consumption; at least when it is not idle.

Here an overview of power costs.

 

 

Core2 Quad Q8200 vs Intel Core i7-3770

(source)

Pros and Cons summary

Core 2 Quad Q8200 Core i7-3770
General recommendations:

None
General recommendations:

Considerably faster in general,
Supports SSE4.2 / AVX / F16C instructions,
Has integrated HD 4000 graphics,
Needs less power
Drawbacks:

Considerably lower overall performance,
Lacks some instructions,
Does not have integrated GPU,
Somewhat higher power,
Obsolete socket
Drawbacks:

None

 

 

Core2 Q8200 Vs I7 3770 Performance

.

 

The i-3770 leads in power consumption.

 

 

 

.

Overview Power Consumption

The power consumption overview shows that Intel processors are a lot better than the AMD FX models.

 

 

Power Consumption Overview

.

Dell XPS430 Lüfter

Dell XPS430 Lüfter
Dell XPS430 Lüfter

- Click to enlarge

George-BG Biostar Pieces

 

From Old Computer: Can be used

  • SSD –> Use it
  • Power supply –> Maybe
  • RAM DDR3 –> Tested

 

Can’t be used

  • Motherboard
  • Case
  • Processor

1) Biostar Mainboard Connections

Biostar Mainboard Connections (1)
Biostar Mainboard Connections (1)

- Click to enlarge

Biostar Mainboard Connections (2)

Biostar Mainboard Connections (3)

.

Biostar Mainboard Connections (4)

Biostar Mainboard Connections (5)

.

 

 

 

 

 

 

See more for H2x Comp Devices