At first, this doesn’t seem too bad, but the spin tools don’t know how each set of words will look when paired together, so our simple phrase could turn into something like:

“It is crucial to have the best quality, distinctive articles for your publication”.

Compare those phrases. The original phrase is easy to read, flows naturally, and is easy to understand. The second example looks like something that has been put through Google translate a few times for a joke. That’s because, in effect, it has!

Do a Proofread after Spinning

The effort for a quick proof reading is far less than creating new articles.
For example, the images are already there.

Software comparison

Sources: Quora, InetSolutions

Good quality
API
Good price

Based on the comparison, requirements and results, we decided to go with Spinbot. As a second option we can try Spinner chief.

In general, there are no perfect Spinner and there is no many options.

Other languages

There is no option to spin on other languages than English, due to lack of database.

Test article

For the test, we use a random article from European blog. For example: How we won the Great War but lost the economy by David Smith

Free Article Spinner by Spinbot.com

Free Article Spinner by Spinbot.com

(Same as Spinbot, just different company name)

Good quality – YES
API (link) – Yes,
Price: 1000 spinned articles for $5
Web: $10 / month

API Quality: 5/10

Original text:

This is a moment of history. The Great War itself went slowly, painfully so, but the period since we were marking 100 years from its start, four years ago, to today’s centenary of the Armistice seems to have flashed by. Those four years, of course, have included events that will also change the course of history.

You might think there is not much new left to say about the 1914-18 war. We rightly commemorate the sacrifices made in the world’s first industrial war, as we have done for many years. That is what todays’s 100th anniversary is all about.

But historians, including economic historians, are always delving, and discovering. A new Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) collection, The Great War: A Centennial Perspective, edited by Stephen Broadberry and Mark Harrison, available as a free eBook on the vox-eu.org website, taught me things I did not know.

Calling it the Great War, for example, was commonplace until the 1940s, until the bigger 1939-45 saw it downgraded to merely the first of two 20th century world wars. By the 1960s the Great War description was much more rarely used but I will stick with it today.

Harrison, professor of economics at Warwick University, points out that the war was no accidental conflict brought on by a chance assassination in Sarajevo; it was fully intended. It was not undertaken for commercial advantage, being opposed by business interests in all countries. It was less “needless slaughter”, though French and British losses occurred at a faster rate than those for German troops and there was a terrible waste of life, than a calculated war of attrition.

He also challenges the view that Germany was starved into submission by the cutting off of food imports, a myth later fostered by Hitler. German war mobilisation did more to damage food production and create hunger on the home front, which in the end undermined its war effort.

Text Quality: 9/10

Spinned text:

This is a snapshot of history. The Great War itself went gradually, agonizingly along these lines, yet the period since we were checking 100 years from its begin, four years back, to the present centennial of the Armistice appears to have flashed by. Those four years, obviously, have included occasions that will likewise change the course of history.

You may think there isn’t much new left to say in regards to the 1914-18 war. We appropriately celebrate the penances made on the planet’s first mechanical war, as we have improved the situation numerous years. That is what todays’ 100th commemoration is about.

In any case, students of history, including financial antiquarians, are continually digging, and finding. Another Center for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) accumulation, The Great War: A Centennial Perspective, altered by Stephen Broadberry and Mark Harrison, accessible as a free eBook on the vox-eu.org site, showed me things I didn’t have the foggiest idea.

Considering it the Great War, for instance, was typical until the 1940s, until the greater 1939-45 saw it downsized to simply the first of two twentieth century world wars. By the 1960s the Great War portrayal was significantly more once in a while utilized yet I will stay with it today.

Harrison, teacher of financial aspects at Warwick University, brings up that the war was no inadvertent clash expedited by a possibility death in Sarajevo; it was completely proposed. It was not embraced for business advantage, being restricted by business interests in all nations. It was less “unnecessary butcher”, however French and British misfortunes happened at a quicker rate than those for German troops and there was a horrible misuse of life, than a determined war of wearing down.

He additionally challenges the view that Germany was famished into accommodation by the cutting off of nourishment imports, a legend later cultivated by Hitler. German war assembly accomplished more to harm sustenance generation and make hunger on the home front, which at last undermined its war exertion.

Spinner chief Free Version

Original link

Only Competition

Good quality – YES
API (link)
Free

Original text:

This is a moment of history. The Great War itself went slowly, painfully so, but the period since we were marking 100 years from its start, four years ago, to today’s centenary of the Armistice seems to have flashed by. Those four years, of course, have included events that will also change the course of history.

You might think there is not much new left to say about the 1914-18 war. We rightly commemorate the sacrifices made in the world’s first industrial war, as we have done for many years. That is what todays’s 100th anniversary is all about.

But historians, including economic historians, are always delving, and discovering. A new Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) collection, The Great War: A Centennial Perspective, edited by Stephen Broadberry and Mark Harrison, available as a free eBook on the vox-eu.org website, taught me things I did not know.

Calling it the Great War, for example, was commonplace until the 1940s, until the bigger 1939-45 saw it downgraded to merely the first of two 20th century world wars. By the 1960s the Great War description was much more rarely used but I will stick with it today.

Harrison, professor of economics at Warwick University, points out that the war was no accidental conflict brought on by a chance assassination in Sarajevo; it was fully intended. It was not undertaken for commercial advantage, being opposed by business interests in all countries. It was less “needless slaughter”, though French and British losses occurred at a faster rate than those for German troops and there was a terrible waste of life, than a calculated war of attrition.

He also challenges the view that Germany was starved into submission by the cutting off of food imports, a myth later fostered by Hitler. German war mobilisation did more to damage food production and create hunger on the home front, which in the end undermined its war effort.

Text Quality: 9/10

Spinned text:

This is often a moment of history. The specific Great Battle itself proceeded in order to go slowly, shateringly so, but the period since we were marking one hundred years from the start, four many years ago, to the current centenary of the particular Armistice appears in order to have flashed simply by. Those four many years, naturally, have incorporated events that will also change the period of history.

You might think there is not much new remaining to say regarding the 1914-18 battle. We rightly memorialize the sacrifices produced in the world’s first professional war, as we possess finished many years. That will will is exactly what todays’s 100th anniversary is about.

But historians, including monetary historians, are sampling, plus discovering. A brand new Centre for Financial Plan Research (CEPR) collection, The specific Excellent War: A Chemical Perspective, edited simply by Stephen Broadberry plus Mark Harrison, obtainable as a totally free eBook on the particular vox-eu. org website, taught myself things Some know.

Phoning it the Excellent War, as an example, has been commonplace till the nineteen forties, until the bigger 1939-45 saw this downgraded to merely the first associated with two 20th century world wars. Along with the 1960s the particular Great War description was much a lot more rarely used yet I am going to stay with it today.

Harrison, professor of economics at Warwick College, highlights that the particular war was no accidental conflict because of to a opportunity assassination in Sarajevo; it was fully developed. It had been not performed for commercial advantage, being opposed simply by business passions in every countries. This was less “needless slaughter”, though People from france and British reduction occurred faster than those for German troops and there has been a terrible waste associated with life, than the calculated war associated with attrition.

He furthermore problems the view outside the window that Australia was deprived into submitting simply by the cutting away of food imports, a myth later on fostered by Hitler. German war mobilisation did more to harm food production that craving for food on the home front side, which the closing undermined its battle effort.

Spinner chief Pro Version

Original link

Only Competition

Good quality – YES
API (link)
Average, $150 Fixed Price

No demo possible.

Text Quality: 9/10

Spinbot.com

Original link

(same as Free article spinner, just different company name)

Good quality – YES
API (link)
– price: 1000 spinned articles for $5

Original text:

This is a moment of history. The Great War itself went slowly, painfully so, but the period since we were marking 100 years from its start, four years ago, to today’s centenary of the Armistice seems to have flashed by. Those four years, of course, have included events that will also change the course of history.

You might think there is not much new left to say about the 1914-18 war. We rightly commemorate the sacrifices made in the world’s first industrial war, as we have done for many years. That is what todays’s 100th anniversary is all about.

But historians, including economic historians, are always delving, and discovering. A new Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) collection, The Great War: A Centennial Perspective, edited by Stephen Broadberry and Mark Harrison, available as a free eBook on the vox-eu.org website, taught me things I did not know.

Calling it the Great War, for example, was commonplace until the 1940s, until the bigger 1939-45 saw it downgraded to merely the first of two 20th century world wars. By the 1960s the Great War description was much more rarely used but I will stick with it today.

Harrison, professor of economics at Warwick University, points out that the war was no accidental conflict brought on by a chance assassination in Sarajevo; it was fully intended. It was not undertaken for commercial advantage, being opposed by business interests in all countries. It was less “needless slaughter”, though French and British losses occurred at a faster rate than those for German troops and there was a terrible waste of life, than a calculated war of attrition.

He also challenges the view that Germany was starved into submission by the cutting off of food imports, a myth later fostered by Hitler. German war mobilisation did more to damage food production and create hunger on the home front, which in the end undermined its war effort.

Grade: 7/10

Spinned article text:

This is a snapshot of history. The Great War itself went gradually, agonizingly along these lines, however the period since we were stamping 100 years from its begin, four years prior, to the present centennial of the Armistice appears to have flashed by. Those four years, obviously, have included occasions that will likewise change the course of history.

You may think there isn’t much new left to say in regards to the 1914-18 war. We properly remember the penances made on the planet’s first mechanical war, as we have improved the situation numerous years. That is what todays’ 100th commemoration is about.

In any case, history specialists, including financial students of history, are continually diving, and finding. Another Center for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) gathering, The Great War: A Centennial Perspective, altered by Stephen Broadberry and Mark Harrison, accessible as a free eBook on the vox-eu.org site, showed me things I didn’t have the foggiest idea.

Considering it the Great War, for instance, was ordinary until the 1940s, until the greater 1939-45 saw it downsized to simply the first of two twentieth century world wars. By the 1960s the Great War portrayal was significantly more once in a while utilized yet I will stay with it today.

Harrison, teacher of financial aspects at Warwick University, brings up that the war was no unplanned clash expedited by a shot death in Sarajevo; it was completely proposed. It was not attempted for business advantage, being contradicted by business interests in all nations. It was less “unnecessary butcher”, however French and British misfortunes happened at a quicker rate than those for German troops and there was a horrible misuse of life, than a determined war of wearing down.

He additionally challenges the view that Germany was famished into accommodation by the cutting off of sustenance imports, a legend later encouraged by Hitler. German war assembly accomplished more to harm nourishment generation and make hunger on the home front, which at last undermined its war exertion.

Best Spinner

Original link

Good quality – YES
API – No
Good price – YES, free

Original text:

This is a moment of history. The Great War itself went slowly, painfully so, but the period since we were marking 100 years from its start, four years ago, to today’s centenary of the Armistice seems to have flashed by. Those four years, of course, have included events that will also change the course of history.

You might think there is not much new left to say about the 1914-18 war. We rightly commemorate the sacrifices made in the world’s first industrial war, as we have done for many years. That is what todays’s 100th anniversary is all about.

But historians, including economic historians, are always delving, and discovering. A new Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) collection, The Great War: A Centennial Perspective, edited by Stephen Broadberry and Mark Harrison, available as a free eBook on the vox-eu.org website, taught me things I did not know.

Calling it the Great War, for example, was commonplace until the 1940s, until the bigger 1939-45 saw it downgraded to merely the first of two 20th century world wars. By the 1960s the Great War description was much more rarely used but I will stick with it today.

Harrison, professor of economics at Warwick University, points out that the war was no accidental conflict brought on by a chance assassination in Sarajevo; it was fully intended. It was not undertaken for commercial advantage, being opposed by business interests in all countries. It was less “needless slaughter”, though French and British losses occurred at a faster rate than those for German troops and there was a terrible waste of life, than a calculated war of attrition.

He also challenges the view that Germany was starved into submission by the cutting off of food imports, a myth later fostered by Hitler. German war mobilisation did more to damage food production and create hunger on the home front, which in the end undermined its war effort.

Text Grade: 7/10

Spinned text:

This is a historical moment. The Great War itself was slow, painful, but the period since we marked 100 years from the beginning, four years ago, up to hundreds of years the Armistice seemed to have passed. The four years, of course, have included events that will also change the course of history.

You might think there is not much left to say about the 1914-1918 war. We correctly commemorate the sacrifices made in the first industrial war in the world, as we have done for years. That is the 100th anniversary today.

But historians, including economic historians, always dig, and find. A new collection of the Economic Policy Research Center (CEPR), The Great War: A Centennial, edited by Stephen Broadberry and Mark Harrison, is available as a free e-book on the vox-eu.org website, teaching me things that I don’t know.

Calling it the Great War, for example, was common until the 1940s, until the greater 1939-45 saw it lowered to only the first of two 20th century world wars. In the 1960s, the description of the Great War was far less used but I would still use it today.

Harrison, professor of economics at Warwick University, points out that war is not an accidental conflict caused by the possibility of murder in Sarajevo; it was fully intended. That was not done for commercial gain, opposed by business interests in all countries. It was lacking “unnecessary slaughter”, although the losses of France and Britain occurred at a faster rate than for German forces and there was a terrible waste of life, from calculated calculation wars.

He also challenged the view that Germany was starving in submissions by cutting food imports, a myth then fostered by Hitler. German war mobilization did more to undermine food production and create hunger in front of homes, which ultimately undermined its war effort.

FastSage Spinner

Original link

Good quality – Yes
API (link)
– Yes
Good price – YES, $7 / monthly

Original text:

This is a moment of history. The Great War itself went slowly, painfully so, but the period since we were marking 100 years from its start, four years ago, to today’s centenary of the Armistice seems to have flashed by. Those four years, of course, have included events that will also change the course of history.

You might think there is not much new left to say about the 1914-18 war. We rightly commemorate the sacrifices made in the world’s first industrial war, as we have done for many years. That is what todays’s 100th anniversary is all about.

But historians, including economic historians, are always delving, and discovering. A new Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) collection, The Great War: A Centennial Perspective, edited by Stephen Broadberry and Mark Harrison, available as a free eBook on the vox-eu.org website, taught me things I did not know.

Calling it the Great War, for example, was commonplace until the 1940s, until the bigger 1939-45 saw it downgraded to merely the first of two 20th century world wars. By the 1960s the Great War description was much more rarely used but I will stick with it today.

Harrison, professor of economics at Warwick University, points out that the war was no accidental conflict brought on by a chance assassination in Sarajevo; it was fully intended. It was not undertaken for commercial advantage, being opposed by business interests in all countries. It was less “needless slaughter”, though French and British losses occurred at a faster rate than those for German troops and there was a terrible waste of life, than a calculated war of attrition.

He also challenges the view that Germany was starved into submission by the cutting off of food imports, a myth later fostered by Hitler. German war mobilisation did more to damage food production and create hunger on the home front, which in the end undermined its war effort.

Text Grade: 5/10

Spinned Text:

This is a moment of historical past. The Great War itself went slowly, worryingly fittingly, however the duration given that we had been marking 100 years from its start, four years in the past, not only lately’s centenary of financial Armistice seems as well as gain flashed by means of. Those 4 years, in fact, believe integrated occasions that can even trade balance course of historical past.

You would possibly think there isn’t much unusual left to mention concerning the 1914-18 war. We fittingly commemorate sheet sacrifices made on the planet’s skilled business conflict, additionally now we have achieved for a few years. That is what todays’s 100th anniversary is all approximately.

But historians, together with economic historians, are at all times delving, together with discovering. A unique Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) assortment, The Great War: A Centennial Perspective, edited by means of Stephen Broadberry as a matter of fact Mark Harrison, to be had not to mention a loose eBook at the vox-ecu.Org website online, taught me issues I didn’t know.

Calling it the Great War, as an example, was commonplace till records Nineteen Forties, till the larger 1939-forty five saw it downgraded not only merely the first of two twentieth century international wars. By financial Nineteen Sixties financial Great War report was once much more hardly ever faded but I will stick with it as of late.

Harrison, professor of economics at Warwick University, issues out that records warfare was once no unintentional struggle brought on by an opportunity assassination in Sarajevo; it used to be fully intended. It was now not undertaken for commercial benefit, living thing adverse via industry pursuits in all countries. It was once much less “useless slaughter”, regardless that French as a matter of fact British losses came about at a sooner fee than those for German troops as a matter of fact there was a horrible demolish of life, than a calculated conflict of attrition.

He also demanding situations records plan that Germany was once starved into consent by means of statement chopping off of meals imports, a fable future fostered via Hitler. German struggle mobilisation did more to break meals production as a matter of fact fabricate hunger at the house front, which in any case undermined its war attempt.

Article Writer Pro

Original link

Good quality – No
API – Yes (link)
Good price – YES, $5 / monthly

Original text:

This is a moment of history. The Great War itself went slowly, painfully so, but the period since we were marking 100 years from its start, four years ago, to today’s centenary of the Armistice seems to have flashed by. Those four years, of course, have included events that will also change the course of history.

You might think there is not much new left to say about the 1914-18 war. We rightly commemorate the sacrifices made in the world’s first industrial war, as we have done for many years. That is what todays’s 100th anniversary is all about.

But historians, including economic historians, are always delving, and discovering. A new Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) collection, The Great War: A Centennial Perspective, edited by Stephen Broadberry and Mark Harrison, available as a free eBook on the vox-eu.org website, taught me things I did not know.

Calling it the Great War, for example, was commonplace until the 1940s, until the bigger 1939-45 saw it downgraded to merely the first of two 20th century world wars. By the 1960s the Great War description was much more rarely used but I will stick with it today.

Harrison, professor of economics at Warwick University, points out that the war was no accidental conflict brought on by a chance assassination in Sarajevo; it was fully intended. It was not undertaken for commercial advantage, being opposed by business interests in all countries. It was less “needless slaughter”, though French and British losses occurred at a faster rate than those for German troops and there was a terrible waste of life, than a calculated war of attrition.

He also challenges the view that Germany was starved into submission by the cutting off of food imports, a myth later fostered by Hitler. German war mobilisation did more to damage food production and create hunger on the home front, which in the end undermined its war effort.

Text Quality: 3/10

Spinned text:

This is a moment of records. The Great War itself went slowly, painfully so, however the length given that we had been marking 100 years from its start, 4 years in the past, to these days’s centenary of the Armistice seems to have flashed by way of. Those 4 years, of direction, have included events to be able to additionally trade the path of history.

You would possibly suppose there isn’t always an awful lot new left to mention about the 1914-18 struggle. We rightly commemorate the sacrifices made in the international’s first industrial battle, as we have finished for decades. That is what todays’s one hundredth anniversary is all approximately.

But historians, together with financial historians, are always delving, and coming across. A new Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) series, The Great War: A Centennial Perspective, edited through Stephen Broadberry and Mark Harrison, to be had as a loose eBook at the vox-eu.Org website, taught me things I did now not recognise.

Calling it the Great War, as an example, become commonplace till the 1940s, till the larger 1939-forty five noticed it downgraded to merely the primary of two twentieth century world wars. By the 1960s the Great War description become a whole lot more hardly ever used however I will stick with it these days.

Harrison, professor of economics at Warwick University, points out that the battle turned into no accidental battle introduced on by means of a danger assassination in Sarajevo; it turned into completely supposed. It changed into no longer undertaken for commercial benefit, being adverse by means of commercial enterprise interests in all nations. It become less “needless slaughter”, though French and British losses passed off at a quicker fee than those for German troops and there has been a horrible waste of life, than a calculated struggle of attrition.

He additionally challenges the view that Germany was starved into submission by using the slicing off of meals imports, a myth later fostered with the aid of Hitler. German conflict mobilisation did extra to harm food production and create starvation on the house front, which in the long run undermined its struggle effort.